After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are reviving these types of systems. Out of lie detection tools examined at the edge to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being made use of in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to find their way these devices and to go after their right for security.

It also displays how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from interacting with the programs of coverage. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects just who are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double impact: even though they help to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult designed for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.